PDA

View Full Version : GPS/Chartplotter Questions



Torquin
03-30-2008, 03:43 PM
I am in the market for GPS/chartplotter/depth finder. My goals are visibility in sunlight, color display, depth info, GPS, very detailed maps, ability to mark the good fishing spots so I can find them again, and not to break the bank. I don't know that side transducer is necessary. I am not married to any brand, but I would like to have a unit that is expandable, with chip or whatever. My road GPS is a Garmin and I'm pretty happy with it.
I don't know that much about this, so I'm asking here. The choices are so many it makes my head hurt.
From people I have talked to so far:
Local sporting good store, Greentop Sporting Goods: Get Lowrance 525. The Hummingbird GPS isn't very good.
Knowledgable fisherman at work: "Lowrance is kind of "bottom of the line". The local store recommended it because they get a better margin on that brand. Research the maps first, then get a unit based on the maps you want to use. I found C-map NT to be the best. It has detail down to fence posts in lakes."

I will be fishing mostly inland in central Virginia, rivers/lakes, but a jaunt to brackish water is not out of the realm of possibility. I won't be going into the bay or further as my boat is a 16' flat bottom Alumacraft with 25hp OB. I am told this type of boat does not do well in swells so I will stay away from that.
I would like to hear from anyone with something contructive to say, good or bad, about any brand or feature, or map info.

Thanks,
Chris :fishing2:

PREDATOR27
03-30-2008, 04:03 PM
The lowrance 525 has a very bright sunlight viewable screen. For the price, my 2 cents, it can't be beat. The unit does everything I need it to do out 85 miles off shore. The unit shows my boat sitting in it's slip on the chart. When I receive a dsl call from my friend 4 slips down it shows his boat in his slip. Pretty accurate charts.

Torquin
03-30-2008, 04:12 PM
Predator, do you have additional charts loaded, from Lowrance or other?
How detailed are your charts?
My concern is I want to see the structure under water, or rather know where it is so I can go there, then do the "fine tuning" with the depth finder once I get to the place where the "hole" is supposed to be (catfishing).

Thanks,
Chris

PREDATOR27
03-30-2008, 04:25 PM
Yes, I purchased the nav. chart for my area. It shows my slip, all buoys, bottom contours, bottom depth, tidal activity, currents and wrecks.

Torquin
04-01-2008, 08:23 AM
You make the Lowrance sound pretty good. I am leaning that way.

Thanks,
Chris

johnholtonde
04-02-2008, 10:53 AM
I've been looking for a combo highway/marine gps. I've only seen lowrance's xogtc. Anybody use that or another? Thanks

PREDATOR27
04-02-2008, 10:20 PM
Let me just mention the lowrance does not give me satelite overviews, pictures of harbours or other feature of a higher priced Garmin unit. Those features were not important to me.

CapitanAmerica
04-03-2008, 08:00 PM
This is what Lowrance can give you, from ther lowest priced LMS unit to there highest priced LCX. They all can use Navionics Platinum data cards.
All can be used with radar, have excellent sonar, and have bright, clear, high resolution screens.
The Navionics aerial photo shots don't appear to be of very high resolution, but you can put you own JPG pictures on a data card and they will be very clear when displayed on the unit screen

http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/capitamamerica/Screen005.jpg


http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/capitamamerica/Screen006.jpg


http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/capitamamerica/platinum3d.jpg


http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/capitamamerica/lbs103-27-08.jpg

Torquin
04-03-2008, 10:18 PM
CapitanAmerica, thanks for posting this info. Another fellow, who tells me has has both a Lowrance and a Garmin, tells me that he likes the Garmin better because it's more user-friendly to use. I have also read where the Lowrance is more "menu-driven" than the Garmin and the author said that the Garmin was simpler to use.
Any thoughts on your end?

Thanks,
Chris

CapitanAmerica
04-03-2008, 11:06 PM
To me "menu driven" means easy to operate. Having been in the Data processing
field sense the early 70's, I can really appreciate what these sonar/chartplotters have developed into.
Don't think you would have any problem learning Lowrance or Garmin. Certainly does
not take a PHD to figure this stuff out. If all else fails we can always read the manuel.
Same with any of the other makes.
I do have a few friends who have bought these things and just refuse to learn how
to use them properly, and then blame any problems on the unit itself. I have become
"the guy" were I boat to keep all of there electronics working.
I like Lowrance and there is certainly nothing "low end" about them. Check the radar screen shots I put on another post. I have used most everything out there and the only one I would never buy again is RayMarine. But that's another story.

good luck on whatever yo decide.

Seahunter
04-04-2008, 10:24 AM
This is what Lowrance can give you, from ther lowest priced LMS unit to there highest priced LCX. They all can use Navionics Platinum data cards.
All can be used with radar, have excellent sonar, and have bright, clear, high resolution screens.
The Navionics aerial photo shots don't appear to be of very high resolution, but you can put you own JPG pictures on a data card and they will be very clear when displayed on the unit screen

http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/capitamamerica/Screen006.jpg



Looks like Navionics could use some help in their proof reading department as well. What's a yatch repair? :D

CapitanAmerica
04-04-2008, 01:41 PM
There spelling is no better than mine, but we know th old saying
"A picture is worth a thousand words", even ones that are spelled wrong.

gus
04-04-2008, 06:38 PM
you better consider not only the product, but the company as well. i paid 2 grand for an lcx 19c when they came out. it crapped out 2 years later (screen went white after 1 min). lowrance said they couldnt fix the unit because they didnt make parts for the 19c anymore. they offered me 200 dollars off for the newer model which was exactly the same. it took me a half hour on hold every time i called for technical assistance or customer assistancewith lowrance. they never even responded to my emails. when i spend 2 grand on something i expect it to work more than 2 years and at least be fixable. i i now own a furuno. i have called furuno with technical questions 3 times. i averaged two rings each time. ill never spend another cent with lowrance they do not back their product.

Torquin
04-09-2008, 09:08 PM
I ended up getting the Lowrance 522. The guys at the local sporting goods place were helpful. I didn't get a chip yet though. I was surprised to find that the river coverage isn't that big, and you either get rivers or lakes on a chip. I will have to get the coastal chip for fishing the James river, and that's only below Richmond. Somehow I thought that the river coverage would be greater.
As far as the lakes, well, smaller lakes aren't inlcuded, and I figure no ponds would be included, but all the lakes would be.
Live and learn.
Still trying to figure out the difference between Navionics Hotmaps Premium and Hotmaps Platinum. I have seen Premium on Ebay cheaper than locally, but I have not yet seen Platinum, and I wonder if I need to hold out for that/buy it locally.

Chris

gus
04-10-2008, 01:09 PM
i have my old nauticpath card ill sell on the cheap - entire US, not sure if it is compatible